|
AUTOPOIETIC SYSTEMS |
|
SYMPOIETIC SYSTEMS |
|
Defining Characteristics |
|
|
|
self-producing |
|
collectively producing |
|
self-produced boundaries |
|
lacking boundaries |
|
organizationally closed |
|
organizationally ajar |
|
external structural coupling |
|
internal and external structural coupling |
|
Characteristic Tendencies |
|
|
|
autonomous units |
|
complex, amorphous entities |
|
central control |
|
distributed control |
|
'packaged,' same information |
|
distributed, different information |
|
reproduction by copy |
|
amorphous reproduction |
|
evolution between systems |
|
evolution within system |
|
growth/development oriented |
|
evolutionary orientation |
|
homeostatic balance |
|
balance by dynamic tension |
|
steady state |
|
potentially dramatic, surprising change |
|
finite temporal trajectories |
|
potentially infinite temporal trajectories |
|
predictable |
|
unpredictable |
|
Advantages/disadvantages |
|
|
|
efficient |
|
adaptable, flexible |
|
constrained, codified information |
|
open to new and different information |
|
require certainty |
|
ok with surprise |
Slightly adapted from:
Dempster, Beth "Sympoietic and autopoietic systems: A new distinction for self-organizing systems" in Proceedings of the World Congress of the Systems Sciences and ISSS 2000, J.K. Allen and J. Wilby, eds.
[Presented at the International Society for Systems Studies Annual Conference, Toronto, Canada, July 2000] - abstract - pdf file -
|
|