|
Although we often refer to "the" ecosystem approach, it is important to recognize that there are variations, which depend on a combination of factors:
ecosystem" conceptualized?
- does it include humans?
- does it incorporate recognition of complexity, uncertainty, unpredictability, self-organization?
- does it have boundaries? are they strict, permeable, fuzzy...?
What is the basis for using the approach? What direction does promotion of the 'approach' come from?
- scientific? i.e. from developments in ecosystem theory, landscape ecology etc.
- political? e.g. from calls for more participatory approaches? or from experts attempting to exert power
- social? e.g. from concerns about conflicts over land-use, or sustainability
What are the dominant themes in the political-social-scientific context?
- who tends to be 'in charge'? are processes in general: expert-driven, control oriented? participatory? collaborative?
- means for resolving conflict? or for 'managing' ecosystems?
Different answers to these questions lead to various different approaches - each of which may be referred to (by their proponents or others) as "the ecosystem approach." The variations include:
Integrated Resource Management
as described in Mitchell (1997), Born and Sonzogni (1995) Margerum and Born (1995)
Agroecosystem analysis
as described in Mitchell (1997)
David Waltner-Toews, U. of Guelph - who's research also incorporates complex systems considerations
Complex systems based ecosystem approach
based on recognizing ecosystems as complex self-organizing systems inclusive of humans
NWCoast Forestry based ecosystem approach
although already in existence, this was popularized through concerns over the spotted owl and the Clinton Forest Plan - tends to take 'ecosystem science' as basic
Greater Ecosystem Conservation Planning
e.g. in Canadian National Parks
Ecosystem Conservation Plan for Georgian Bay Islands National Park, prepared by Gordon Nelson and Andy Skibicki, Heritage Resources Centre, UW
e.g. in US National Parks (popularized through Yellowstone)
Others...
|
|
some references
This list just provides a taste of references that I have found interesting. It is not intended to be a comprehensive or representative sample of references on ecosystem approaches. Inclusion on the list does not necessarily indicate my agreement with the views put forward by the authors...
some bibliographies available on the web:
**Crober, Andrew M. 1999 An Annotated Bibliography on the Ecosystem Approach to Ecosystem Management University of Waterloo web doc
Eckhardt. Carol, compiler 1998 The Human Factor in Ecological Research: An Annotated Bibliography Portland OR, USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-429 web doc
ERS 305 University of Waterloo web doc
various representations or comments on ecosystem approaches
**Allen, T.F.H., B.L. Bandurski, and A.W. King 1993 The Ecosystem Approach: theory and ecosystem integrity International Joint Commission (Report on the Great Lakes Science Advisory Board)
**Barsh, R. L. 2000 Taking Indigenous Science Seriously in Biodiversity in Canada, S. Bocking, ed.
Francis, George 1993 Ecosystem Management Natural Resources Journal 33 (2): 315-345
Galindo-Leal, C. and F.L. Bunnell 1995 Ecosystem management: Implications and opportunities of a new paradigm Forestry Chronicle 71(5): 601-606
**Grumbine, R. Edward 1994 What Is Ecosystem Management? Conservation Biology 8(1): 27-38
**Grumbine, R. Edward 1997 Reflections on "What is Ecosystem Management?" Conservation Biology 11 (1): 41-47
Gordon, J. C. 1993 Ecosystem Management: An Idosyncratic Overview in Defining Sustainable Forestry, G.H. Aplet, N. Johnson, J.T. Olson, and V.A. Sample, eds. 240-244
*Gunderson, L. H., C. S. Holling and S. S. Light, eds. 1995 Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions Columbia University Press, New York
*Holling, C. S. and M. A. Goldberg 1971 Ecology and Planning Journal of American Institute of Planners 37(4): 221-230
**Jope, K. L. and J. C. Dunstan 1996 Ecosystem-Based Management: Natural Processes and Systems Theory in National Parks and Protected Areas: Their role in environmental protection, R. G. Wright, ed.
Kay, J. J. and E. Schneider 1994 Embracing Complexity: The Challenge of the Ecosystem Approach Alternatives 20(3): 33-39 web doc
**Kay, J. J., H. A. Regier, M. Boyle, and G. Francis 1999 An ecosystem approach for sustainability: addressing the challenge of complexity Futures 31(7): 721-742 web doc
Kay, J.J. and Regier, H. 2000 Uncertainty, complexity, and ecological integrity: Insights from an ecosystem approach in Implementing Ecological Integrity: Restoring Regional and Global Environmental and Human Health, P. Crabbe, A. Holland, L. Ryszkowski and L. Westra, eds. web doc
Skibicki, A. and J. G. Nelson 1993 A Human Ecological Approach to Biodiversity Planning and Management: Point Pelee, Rondeau and Long Point Peninsulas, Lake Erie, Canada Heritage Resources Centre, University of Waterloo Technical Paper #9
Slocombe, D. Scott 1998 Defining Goals and Criteria for Ecosystem-Based Management Environmental Management 22 (4): 483-493
Slocombe, D. Scott 1998 Lessons from experience with ecosystem-based management Landscape and Urban Planning 40: 31-39
*Thomas, J. W. 1994 Forest ecosystem management assessment team: Objectives, processes, and options Journal of Forestry 92: 12-19
Thomas, J. W. and M. Dombeck 1996 Ecosystem management in the Interior Columbia River Basis Wildlife Society Bulletin 24(2): 180-186
Wright, R. Gerald, ed. 1996 National Parks and Protected Areas: Their Role in Environmental Protection Blackwell Science
variations or comments on the concept of ecosystem
Christensen, Norman L. 1988 Succession and Natural Disturbance: Paradigms, Problems and Preservation of Natural Ecosystems in Ecosystem Management for Parks and Wilderness, Agee and Johnson eds. p 62-86
Costanza, R. 1992 Toward An Operational Definition of Ecosystem Health in Ecosystem Health, R. Costanza, B. G. Norton, and B. D. Haskell, eds.
Franklin, J. F. 1993 Preserving biodiversity: Species, ecosystems, or landscapes Ecological Applications 3: 202-205
Franklin, J. F. 1993 The Fundamentals of Ecosystem Management with Applications in the Pacific Northwest in Defining Sustainable Forestry, G.H. Aplet, N. Johnson, J.T. Olson, and V.A. Sample, eds. 127-144
*Golley, Frank B. 1993 History of the Ecosystem concept in ecology: more than the sum of the parts Yale University Press, New Haven
Haydon, R. J. 1997 A Look at How We Look at What is "Natural" Natural Area News 2(1): 2-5
Holling, C. S. 1986 The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change in Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, W.C. Clark and R.E. Mann, eds.
Parks Canada Agency 2000 "Unimpaired for Future Generations" Protecting Ecological Integrity with Canada's National Parks Report of the Panel on the Ecological Integrity of Canada's National Parks Minister of Public Works and government Services, Ottawa, ON
Patten, B. C., S. E. Jorgensen, and S. I. Auerbach 1996 Complex Ecology: The Part-Whole Relation in Ecosystems Prentice Hall
Vale, Thamas R. 1998 The Myth of the Humanized Landscape: An Example From Yosemite National Park
and a few related papers that might promote thinking about ecosystem management in a slightly different manner...
Alpert, P. 1995 Incarnating ecosystem management Conservation Biology 9(4): 962-955
Bennett, John W. 1993 Human ecology as human behaviour: essays in environmental and development anthropology New Brunswick, N.J., Transition Publishers
Bohm, David 1994 Postmodern science and a postmodern world in Ecology: key concepts in critical theory, C. Merchant Atlantic Highlands, N.J., Humanities Press
Johnson, Lawrence E. 1992 Toward the Moral Considerability of Species and Ecosystems
Marston, E. H. 1992 Unexamined scholarship: the land grant universities in the inland west in Watershed management: balancing sustainability and environmental change, R. J. Naiman, ed. New York, Springer-Verlag
Merchant, Carolyn 1994 Ecology: key concepts in critical theory Atlantic Highlands, N.J., Humanities Press
Munro, Neil, ed. 1997 Protected Areas in Our Modern World: Proceedings of a workshop held as part of the IUCN World Conservation Congress, Montreal, Canada, Oct 18&21, 1996 Parks Canada - Ecosystem Science Review Reports #005
Norton, Bryan 1992 Sustainability, Human Welfare, and Ecosystem Health Environmental Values 1(1992): 97-111
Young, G. L. 1994 The case for a 'catholic' ecology Human Ecology Review 1: 310-319
and a few more links-to-papers that I found when looking for FEMAT that might be interesting but which I have not read...
|
|
a few quotes and cartoons to stimulate a little thinking...
It is not easy for us moderns to realize our dependence on the earth...
What do you eat, morning, noon and night? Natural resources... What do you wear, day in and day out? Natural resources... What do you work with, no matter what your work might be? Natural resources... What do you live in and work in? Wood, iron, rock, clay, sand, in a thousand different shapes but always natural resources. - Gifford Pinchot Breaking New Ground 1907(!)
A second myth [of education] is that, with enough knowledge and technology, we can manage planet Earth. Higher education has been largely shaped by the drive to extend human domination to its fullest. In this mission human intelligence may have taken the wrong road. Nonetheless, managing the planet has a nice ring to it. It appeals to our fascination with digital readouts, computers, buttons, and dials. But the complexity of Earth and its life systems can never be safely managed. The ecology of the top inch of topsoil is still largely unknown, as is its relationship to the large systems of the biosphere. What might be managed, however, is us: human desires, economies, politics, and communities. But our attention is caught by those things that avoid the hard choices implied by politics, morality, ethics, and common sense. It makes far better sense to reshape ourselves to fit a finite planet than to attempt to reshape the planet to fit our infinite wants. - David Orr
|